Oximy

gtm plan

an intelligence and distribution system for AI security, not a traditional sales playbook.

iit patna · maths and computing

air 5095 · jee advanced 2023

cracked one of the toughest exams in the world at 17

unfair advantage

the network I have is what you need.

I already operate in the environments Oximy needs

I'm already close to:

  • founders
  • operators
  • engineers
  • AI builders
  • startup ecosystems
  • IIT networks
  • fast-moving product teams

Inter IIT Tech Meet gave me access to companies and a network across all 23 IITs. Real relationships, not just campus visibility.

How I'd build GTM for Oximy

I wouldn't approach this like a traditional sales process.

I'd approach it like building an intelligence and distribution system around AI security.

The goal early on is not “scale outreach.”

The goal is:

  • understand where AI adoption is happening fastest
  • identify where security pain already exists
  • get into the right conversations early
  • build trust with technical teams
  • create repeatable systems around that

Most AI companies are still figuring things out internally.

That's the opportunity.

the plan

five phases. one system.

phase 1 - first 2–3 weeks

Build the signal map

I'd start by building a live ecosystem map around companies actively deploying AI.

Not random lead lists.

Actual signal.

What I'd track

  • startups shipping AI features
  • companies hiring AI infra/platform/security roles
  • teams talking about governance/compliance
  • startups scaling internal copilots or agents
  • AI-native SaaS companies
  • infra-heavy engineering orgs
  • founders publicly discussing AI workflows

Regions

  • SF startups
  • NYC AI ecosystem
  • India AI-native SaaS
  • remote-first AI companies

What this creates

Instead of blind outbound, we know:

  • who's moving fast
  • who's under pressure
  • who probably already has security gaps
  • who recently raised
  • who's scaling too quickly for their current infra

That becomes the foundation for everything else.

phase 2 - weeks 3–6

Build outbound that doesn't feel like outbound

Most outbound fails because it's generic.

Especially with technical buyers.

I'd focus on:

  • contextual outreach
  • company-specific observations
  • AI workflow discussions
  • infra/security pain points
  • founder/operator-level messaging

Not:

“Hey, just checking if you're interested in AI security.”

That gets ignored instantly.

The messaging should feel like:

  • someone who understands their stack
  • understands their velocity
  • and understands what breaks when AI adoption scales too fast

Channels

  • LinkedIn
  • X/Twitter
  • email
  • founder circles
  • Reddit signal monitoring
  • engineering communities
  • warm intros through operators and alumni networks

The objective isn't volume.

The objective is:

book high-quality conversations consistently.

phase 3

Win the meetings

This is probably where I'm strongest.

If I can get someone on a call, I can usually move the conversation somewhere meaningful.

Not because I “sell aggressively.”

Because I adapt fast in live conversations.

I'm good at:

  • reading what people actually care about
  • simplifying technical ideas
  • asking the right questions quickly
  • making conversations feel collaborative
  • understanding operational pain in real time
  • creating trust without sounding scripted

A lot of enterprise GTM dies before the meeting.

I think my advantage starts once the meeting begins.

Honestly, doubting that is fair.

Get on a call with me and see.

phase 4 - weeks 6–10

Build narrative and ecosystem presence

Most AI security companies sound identical online.

Too much jargon.

Too much fear marketing.

Too little real operator insight.

I'd help position Oximy around:

  • real AI adoption problems
  • operational security gaps
  • governance friction
  • velocity vs safety tradeoffs
  • lessons from teams shipping AI fast

Content style

Not polished enterprise fluff.

More:

  • observations
  • breakdowns
  • short operator insights
  • ecosystem analysis
  • technical GTM content
  • "here's what we're seeing" style narratives

The goal is to become recognizable inside:

  • AI founder circles
  • infra communities
  • engineering ecosystems
  • startup operators

phase 5 - long-term

Turn GTM into infrastructure

Long-term, GTM shouldn't depend on brute-force outreach forever.

I'd help build:

  • outbound systems
  • CRM workflows
  • lead intelligence pipelines
  • content loops
  • meeting feedback systems
  • referral loops
  • automated follow-ups
  • account research systems
  • ecosystem relationship maps

Because eventually:

distribution itself should become infrastructure.

That's already how I think.

Why I fit this

I don't come from a polished enterprise background.

I come from environments where:

  • ambiguity is normal
  • systems are broken
  • timelines are unrealistic
  • and execution matters more than presentations

At Saturn Labs, I worked across:

  • operations
  • hiring
  • product execution
  • backend systems
  • rapid iteration

Sometimes the gap between idea and deployment was less than a day.

At Inter IIT Tech Meet 14.0, I led execution across:

  • 23 IITs
  • 2000+ participants
  • ₹1Cr+ operations
  • multiple external partners and internal teams

That experience trained me to:

  • operate under pressure
  • coordinate chaos
  • make decisions quickly
  • and keep moving when things stop being organized

I also think deeply about distribution.

TRXND came from a simple belief:

most products don't fail at the build. they fail at distribution.

So I've spent time building:

  • content engines
  • outbound systems
  • lead pipelines
  • narrative systems
  • Reddit intelligence tooling
  • marketing infrastructure
  • account orchestration systems

Because I don't see GTM as “sales.”

I see it as systems design.

And even though I'm based in India, I don't think modern GTM is geography-bound anymore.

The buyers may be in SF.

But the leverage now comes from:

  • intelligence
  • positioning
  • communication
  • systems
  • speed
  • consistency
  • relationship building online

Most founders don't need another generic SDR.

They need someone who:

  • thinks like an operator
  • understands technical environments
  • communicates naturally
  • learns fast
  • builds systems
  • creates momentum
  • and can execute independently

That's the lane where I fit naturally.